From: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:04:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801300904.48299.a1426z@gawab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080129172232.GA9770@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Jan Kara wrote:
> > Chris Snook wrote:
> > > Al Boldi wrote:
> > > > This RFC proposes to introduce a tunable which allows to disable
> > > > fsync and changes ordered into writeback writeout on a per-process
> > > > basis like this:
> > > >
> > > > echo 1 > /proc/`pidof process`/softsync
> > >
> > > This is basically a kernel workaround for stupid app behavior.
> >
> > Exactly right to some extent, but don't forget the underlying
> > data=ordered starvation problem, which looks like a genuinely deep
> > problem maybe related to blockIO.
>
> It is a problem with the way how ext3 does fsync (at least that's what
> we ended up with in that konqueror problem)... It has to flush the
> current transaction which means that app doing fsync() has to wait till
> all dirty data of all files on the filesystem are written (if we are in
> ordered mode). And that takes quite some time... There are possibilities
> how to avoid that but especially with freshly created files, it's tough
> and I don't see a way how to do it without some fundamental changes to
> JBD.
Ok, but keep in mind that this starvation occurs even in the absence of
fsync, as the benchmarks show.
And, a quick test of successive 1sec delayed syncs shows no hangs until about
1 minute (~180mb) of db-writeout activity, when the sync abruptly hangs for
minutes on end, and io-wait shows almost 100%.
Now it turns out that 'echo 3 > /proc/.../drop_caches' has no effect, but
doing it a few more times makes the hangs go away for while, only to come
back again and again.
Thanks!
--
Al
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-30 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-24 20:36 [RFC] ext3: per-process soft-syncing data=ordered mode Al Boldi
2008-01-24 21:50 ` Diego Calleja
2008-01-26 5:27 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-28 17:34 ` Jan Kara
2008-01-24 21:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-26 5:27 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-25 1:19 ` Chris Snook
2008-01-26 5:28 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-29 17:22 ` Jan Kara
2008-01-30 6:04 ` Al Boldi [this message]
2008-01-30 14:29 ` Chris Mason
2008-01-30 18:39 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-31 0:32 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-31 6:20 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-31 16:56 ` Chris Mason
2008-01-31 17:10 ` Jan Kara
2008-01-31 17:14 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-01 21:26 ` Al Boldi
2008-02-04 17:54 ` Jan Kara
2008-02-05 7:07 ` Al Boldi
2008-02-05 15:07 ` Jan Kara
2008-02-05 19:20 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-25 6:47 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-25 21:57 ` david
2008-01-25 15:36 ` Jan Kara
2008-01-26 5:27 ` Al Boldi
2008-01-28 17:27 ` Jan Kara
2008-01-28 20:17 ` Al Boldi
2008-02-07 0:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-02-10 14:54 ` Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200801300904.48299.a1426z@gawab.com \
--to=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).