From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: projected date for mount.cifs to support DFS junction points
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 04:07:40 +0000
Message-ID: <20080206040740.GA6550@infradead.org>
References: <1199988975.7483.3.camel@gn2.draper.com> <524f69650801101228o3639363cp4c9710d747b71ead@mail.gmail.com> <20080111090749.GA14910@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, sfrench@us.ibm.com,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, akpm@osdl.org
To: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49376 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750996AbYBFEHp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 5 Feb 2008 23:07:45 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080111090749.GA14910@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:07:49AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> If you want to get it into 2.6.25 get it out for review on -fsdevel
> ASAP.  2.6.24 is almost done and it needs to be in acceptable state
> before 2.6.25 opens.

So I've done an extensive review now, but the patches (or rather an
incomplete set, that's even dumber) made it into Linus tree without
things beeing addressed.  That's not how it's supposed to work.