From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: BTRFS partition usage... Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:26:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20080212.152652.217936905.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080212.001104.172517283.davem@davemloft.net> <200802120849.34477.chris.mason@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, btrfs-devel@oss.oracle.com To: jengelh@computergmbh.de Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:46402 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbYBLX0U (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:26:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Jan Engelhardt Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:00:20 +0100 (CET) > (Yes, I had xfs on sparc before, so it's not like you NEED the > whitespace at the start of a partition.) You actully do unless you want to lose significant chunks of your disk space. The Sun disk label only allows you to specify the start of a partition in cylinders, so if you want to use a filesystem like XFS you have to start the partition on cylinder 1 which can be many blocks into the disk. That entire first cylinder is completely wasted. What XFS does by putting the superblock at zero is simply does not take these kinds of issues into consideration.