From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: BTRFS partition usage... Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:33:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20080212.153329.98384016.davem@davemloft.net> References: <200802120849.34477.chris.mason@oracle.com> <200802120908.59602.chris.mason@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jengelh@computergmbh.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, btrfs-devel@oss.oracle.com To: chris.mason@oracle.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:58992 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168AbYBLXc5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:32:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200802120908.59602.chris.mason@oracle.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Chris Mason Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:08:59 -0500 > I've had requests to move the super down to 64k to make room for > bootloaders, which may not matter for sparc, but I don't really plan > on different locations for different arches. The Sun disk label sits in the first 512 bytes and the boot loader block sits in the second 512 bytes. I think leaving even more space is a good idea for several reasons.