From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v8) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:21:03 -0800 Message-ID: <20080214222103.a5d8f4fe.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080205213616.343721693@szeredi.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hch@infradead.org, serue@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:53384 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759541AbYBOGVe (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:21:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080205213616.343721693@szeredi.hu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:36:16 +0100 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Just documentation updates, compared to the previous submission. > Thanks to Serge for the relentless reviews :) > > Please consider for -mm, and then for 2.6.26. Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the decks are clear for looking at this work. However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with unprivileged mounts. Could we coordinate things a bit please? Decide who goes first, review and maybe even test each others work, etc? Thanks.