From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 00/10] mount ownership and unprivileged mount syscall (v8) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:09:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20080215010951.163fe10e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080205213616.343721693@szeredi.hu> <20080214222103.a5d8f4fe.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080215090120.GA6266@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Miklos Szeredi , serue@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:39771 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751195AbYBOJKe (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:10:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080215090120.GA6266@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:01:20 -0500 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:21:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the decks > > are clear for looking at this work. > > > > However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts > > patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with unprivileged mounts. > > > > Could we coordinate things a bit please? Decide who goes first, review > > and maybe even test each others work, etc? > > Al is setting up a git tree for VFS work. per-mount r/o will go in > as one of the first things, aswell as his rework of the path lookup > logic to fix the intents mess. > That didn't answer my question..