From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Re[2]: [linux-cifs-client] review 5, was Re: projected date for mount.cifs to support DFS junction points Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:32:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20080216133213.GA16162@infradead.org> References: <524f69650802151302h4e631a74pe382ca932cc85c7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Steve French , Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel , linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org To: Q Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:54174 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753162AbYBPNcP (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:32:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:51:52AM +0300, Q wrote: > At first glance cifs_get_inode_info_remote won't work cause it's old dfs > code not new one. But I caught what Christoph meant now, and will try to > rewrite it this way. Yes, this was supposed to be a refactoring of the existing code. By doing your patch ontop of it you just have to replace the cifs_get_inode_info_remote with the correct content :)