From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Security: Add hook to get full maclabel xattr name Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:51:13 -0500 Message-ID: <20080229005113.GA24087@infradead.org> References: <746385.69480.qm@web36611.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1204227035.31790.207.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080228234850.GA25829@infradead.org> <1204243497.2715.24.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20080229003937.GA16343@infradead.org> <1204246206.7363.13.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Quigley , Stephen Smalley , casey@schaufler-ca.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, bfields@fieldses.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LSM List To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:40662 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932816AbYB2Av0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:51:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1204246206.7363.13.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:50:06PM -0800, Trond Myklebust wrote: > As I've told you several times before: we're _NOT_ putting private > ioctl^Hxattrs onto the wire. If the protocol can't be described in an > RFC, then it isn't going in no matter what expletive you choose to > use... It's as unstructured as the named attributes already in. Or file data for that matter.