From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] vfs: add path_create() and path_mknod() Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 02:00:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20080403010016.GU9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1207183329.20254.49.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <200804030047.m330l6Pf032755@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Trond Myklebust , Miklos Szeredi , akpm@linux-foundation.org, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Erez Zadok Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:49474 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753162AbYDCBAt (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 21:00:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200804030047.m330l6Pf032755@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:47:06PM -0400, Erez Zadok wrote: > In message <1207183329.20254.49.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>, Trond Myklebust writes: > > > > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 00:47 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > [...] > > > Again, what for? > > > > It allows you to get rid of the vfsmount 'argument' when opening a file, > > which again lowers the barrier for stacking filesystems. > > > > As far as the filesystems themselves are concerned, the effect is to > > enforce your assertion that file operations should not depend on the > > namespace. > > I'd be delighted the day I won't have to deal with vfsmounts AT ALL in > any stacked f/s. vfsmounts or the fact that any fs may be mounted in many places?