From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] XFS: Unicode case-insensitive lookup implementation Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:55:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20080403185526.GA6045@infradead.org> References: <20080402062508.017738664@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20080402062709.011126702@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <20080403171450.GB22385@infradead.org> <20080403172400.GC22812@samba1> <20080403184333.GA30595@infradead.org> <20080403184739.GB6100@samba1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Barry Naujok , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Allison Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:36697 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753271AbYDCSz0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 14:55:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080403184739.GB6100@samba1> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 11:47:39AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > CI filenames can work perfectly fine without adding validation of file > > names by treating non-conformant bytestreams as not having lower/upper > > case variants. > > Sorry, then I'm not understanding your objection to this patch (and I > don't think I understood that sentence :-). I objected to the part of the patch I've quoted (and the bitsrelated to it), not all of it. That how we do reviews in kernel land, not sure how samba handles it if you have a binary object/don't object policy..