From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:49:09 -0700
Message-ID: <20080414004909.1b21b738.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <1208041121-26787-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com>
	<20080412170304.54f139e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<20080413033344.GA27494@hash.localnet>
	<20080412205544.5e12a7d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<20080413080130.GA9622@infradead.org>
	<20080413012001.8d7967f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<20080413082815.GA20108@infradead.org>
	<E1JkzaV-0003Lm-NB@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
	<1208121358.2700.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
	<E1JlJ4U-0004xa-Sf@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, me@bobcopeland.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42471 "EHLO
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755065AbYDNHtv (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:49:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <E1JlJ4U-0004xa-Sf@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:25:46 +0200 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> And I didn't advocate moving
> ntfs to fuse, still that was done and the resulting filesystem at the
> moment happens to outperform the kernel one in every respect ;)

Gad.  Why?