From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:57:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20080414115740.GA29059@infradead.org> References: <20080412205544.5e12a7d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413080130.GA9622@infradead.org> <20080413012001.8d7967f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413082815.GA20108@infradead.org> <1208121358.2700.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20080414094215.GD2076@shareable.org> <20080414115540.GA5802@shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Miklos Szeredi , dwmw2@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, me@bobcopeland.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:51763 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754367AbYDNL6J (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 07:58:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080414115540.GA5802@shareable.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:55:40PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: > It's not really a joke. It really is a problem: I'm supposed to > provide NTFS support for a project, but the kernel I'm using doesn't > work with FUSE (too old for the FUSE version needed by ntfs-3g), and > the in-kernel NTFS isn't good enough - all the active development work > is done on ntfs-3g. It's getting a little offtopic, but what keeps you from backporting the required fuse version?