From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:57:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20080415165727.GA8783@infradead.org> References: <20080412205544.5e12a7d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413080130.GA9622@infradead.org> <20080413012001.8d7967f4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413082815.GA20108@infradead.org> <1208121358.2700.4.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20080413154459.4b2f125d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413234920.63711ca7@core> <20080413161014.cb06964c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080415151643.GD2454@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , David Woodhouse , Miklos Szeredi , hch@infradead.org, me@bobcopeland.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53593 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751577AbYDOQ5k (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:57:40 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080415151643.GD2454@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 06:16:43PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > We are talking about a filesystem even Christoph considers OK. > > And who asked about the costs of merging crap like > drivers/infiniband/hw/nes/ ? > > Speaking about the latter, with Linus' logic one might argue that OMFS > must not be rejected since it adds support for some hardware... Excatly. I find it very strange to even consider rejecting a rather small and very well written driver for let's say "political" reasons.