From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] omfs: add inode routines Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:56:59 -0400 Message-ID: <20080415235659.GA7068@hash.localnet> References: <1208041121-26787-3-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <20080415183054.GA7176@joi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: Marcin Slusarz Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080415183054.GA7176@joi> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 08:30:59PM +0200, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > + if (be32_to_cpu(omfs_sb->s_magic) != OMFS_MAGIC) { > > can be omfs_sb->s_magic != cpu_to_be32(OMFS_MAGIC) > (cpu_to_be32 can be optimized away even on LE) Good point, I'll change that. > > + if (bh) > > + brelse(bh); > brelse(NULL) is safe to call Yup, I saw that too. I dropped these and added the labels per Miklos' suggestion. > > + return ret; > > +} > > this code leaks omfs_sbi_info (sbi) This one I'm not seeing. FS core calls put_super if ret is nonzero so this should be ok? Thanks! -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com