From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] fix reservation discarding in affs Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 03:04:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20080501030443.d2910e94.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20041212134545.GA6612@lst.de> <20050210103947.GA2622@lst.de> <20080110151216.GA7373@lst.de> <20080207054150.GA6287@lst.de> <20080429150220.GA9398@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Roman Zippel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:50324 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750712AbYEAKFa (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 May 2008 06:05:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080429150220.GA9398@lst.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:02:20 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Sorry for taking so long to get back to this, it had been some busy > weeks.. > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:47:52AM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote: > > With the patch below on top of yours, affs will survive a little longer. > > There were a few problems with recovering from allocation failures (and > > there are probably a few left). > > Yes, with this one affs survives medium-heavy beating with fsstress and > fsx for me. > > Below is a version that merges in my earlier patche which it was ontop > of and fixes up the minor checkpatch.pl complaints. > > Any chance you could send this for inclusion into 2.6.26 so that affs > works reliable there? Could we get the authorship, changelog and signoffs sorted out please?