* Re: LogFS merge
[not found] <20080502133234.GA24080@logfs.org>
@ 2008-05-02 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2008-05-02 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jörn Engel
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, David Woodhouse,
Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig, Al Viro,
linux-fsdevel
Hi Jörn,
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org> wrote:
> not being familiar with either maintaining my own git tree or the -next
> process, I'd still like to get logfs into mainline. It has gone through
> six rounds of reviews and the last has been mostly about crossing some
> i's here and dotting some t's there.
>
> So should it simmer in -next and -mm for another month? Should it go
> straight into -linus?
You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at
mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm
now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: LogFS merge
2008-05-02 14:49 ` LogFS merge Pekka Enberg
@ 2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-05-02 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: J?rn Engel, Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
David Woodhouse, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig,
Al Viro, linux-fsdevel
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at
> mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm
> now.
Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed.
How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather
lethal.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: LogFS merge
2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jörn Engel @ 2008-05-02 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: Pekka Enberg, Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
David Woodhouse, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig,
Al Viro, linux-fsdevel
On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:31:14 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at
> > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm
> > now.
>
> Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed.
>
> How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather
> lethal.
That wart is still itching. I thought I'd need a core patch to remove
it, but looking at it again, I might get away with a private spinlock.
Will get fixed.
Jörn
--
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-02 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080502133234.GA24080@logfs.org>
2008-05-02 14:49 ` LogFS merge Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).