From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:58:00 -0400 Message-ID: <200805021658.01459.chris.mason@oracle.com> References: <200804291601.32945.chris.mason@oracle.com> <200805021034.08358.chris.mason@oracle.com> <481B3C0E.502@tpi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeffschroeder@computer.org, Jan Engelhardt , Jeff Mahoney , Tim Gardner , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, John Johansen To: Tim Gardner Return-path: Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:56916 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935073AbYEBU6o (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 16:58:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <481B3C0E.502@tpi.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 02 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote: > Chris Mason wrote: > > On Friday 02 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote: > > > > [ Btrfs oops with apparmor patched in ] > > > >> Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor > >> exists in Ubuntu 8.04. > >> Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test > >> succeeds? Does this work in SUSE? > >> > >> http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_t > >>est _for_btrfs.patch > > > > Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell > > if the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch: > > I ended up using the CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR test because the other test suggested here sounded like something that might eventually not be very ubuntu specific (instead of the nice a plain CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL). Thanks to everyone for the hints, if someone could please test: http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Hot_Fixes I'd be grateful. -chris