From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: LogFS merge Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 22:33:52 +0200 Message-ID: <20080502203352.GC24080@logfs.org> References: <20080502133234.GA24080@logfs.org> <84144f020805020749r55d5bd3eta82b5cdadb5fffea@mail.gmail.com> <20080502153114.GA7376@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Pekka Enberg , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:37050 "EHLO longford.logfs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934794AbYEBUeM (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 16:34:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080502153114.GA7376@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:31:14 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at > > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm > > now. >=20 > Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed= =2E >=20 > How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather > lethal. That wart is still itching. I thought I'd need a core patch to remove it, but looking at it again, I might get away with a private spinlock. Will get fixed. J=C3=B6rn --=20 Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have. -- unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html