* Re: LogFS merge [not found] <20080502133234.GA24080@logfs.org> @ 2008-05-02 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg 2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Pekka Enberg @ 2008-05-02 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jörn Engel Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, David Woodhouse, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig, Al Viro, linux-fsdevel Hi Jörn, On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Jörn Engel <joern@logfs.org> wrote: > not being familiar with either maintaining my own git tree or the -next > process, I'd still like to get logfs into mainline. It has gone through > six rounds of reviews and the last has been mostly about crossing some > i's here and dotting some t's there. > > So should it simmer in -next and -mm for another month? Should it go > straight into -linus? You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: LogFS merge 2008-05-02 14:49 ` LogFS merge Pekka Enberg @ 2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig 2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-05-02 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pekka Enberg Cc: J?rn Engel, Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, David Woodhouse, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig, Al Viro, linux-fsdevel On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm > now. Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed. How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather lethal. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: LogFS merge 2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig @ 2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jörn Engel @ 2008-05-02 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Pekka Enberg, Stephen Rothwell, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, David Woodhouse, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel, Christoph Hellwig, Al Viro, linux-fsdevel On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:31:14 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at > > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm > > now. > > Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed. > > How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw? That one was rather > lethal. That wart is still itching. I thought I'd need a core patch to remove it, but looking at it again, I might get away with a private spinlock. Will get fixed. Jörn -- Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have. -- unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-02 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20080502133234.GA24080@logfs.org>
2008-05-02 14:49 ` LogFS merge Pekka Enberg
2008-05-02 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-02 20:33 ` Jörn Engel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).