From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] file locking fixes + fuse nfs export support Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 17:17:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20080513211756.GA25349@fieldses.org> References: <20080509124107.645600519@szeredi.hu> <20080509155040.GB798@fieldses.org> <20080509164044.GA1907@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:39182 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760150AbYEMVSD (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 17:18:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:05:28PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > A separate question--does the problem you reported with interrupted lock > > > > requests still exist? > > > > > > No, that bug seems to have gone away in 2.6.26-rc1. Don't know how, > > > since the 2.6.25 + nfs.git was still bad. > > > > Yipes. > > > > > Should I bisect it to see which patch solved it? ;) > > > > That would be kinda amusing.... > > > > Well, and since I don't remember seeing anything that'd fix that I'd > > like to make sure it isn't still lurking. > > Well, it was in the nfs-2.6 tree after all (commit 4d7c402). I just I think you must mean c4d7c402b788b73dc24f1e54a57f89d3dc5eb7bc, "NFS: Remove the buggy lock-if-signalled case from do_setlk()"? > mucked up testing the last time, probably because I didn't truly > believe in this fix. OK, that makes much more sense! Thanks for the confirmation. --b.