From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/67] aufs document Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 17:07:20 -0400 Message-ID: <20080516210720.GG730@josefsipek.net> References: <12109484013324-git-send-email-hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> <1210949976.14706.28.camel@moss-terrapins.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dave Quigley , hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:50770 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755619AbYEPVHg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2008 17:07:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Friday 2008-05-16 16:59, Dave Quigley wrote: > > >A couple of comments about this. First off you might want to reconsider > >how you are breaking up the patches. 67 patches seems a bit much to me > >and while the separation between patches is clear it seems that some of > >them can be folded. Second I'm not sure if I haven't gotten it yet or if > >it wasn't sent but I am missing an Email 0/67. Typically this contains a > > No 0/67 unfortunately, and --no-chain was also missing when calling > git-send-email. (Argh, git-send-email should default to no-chain!) If you use Guilt, it does all the brain-damage removal for you ;) (guilt-patchbomb to be exact) Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- I'm somewhere between geek and normal. - Linus Torvalds