From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] lockd: dont return EAGAIN for a permanent error
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 14:47:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520184710.GA8177@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080515195103.521911468@szeredi.hu>
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
>
> Fix nlm_fopen() to return NLM_FAILED (or NLM_LCK_DENIED_NOLOCKS)
> instead of NLM_LCK_DENIED. The latter means the lock request failed
> because of a conflicting lock (i.e. a temporary error), which is wrong
> in this case.
>
> Also fix the client to return ENOLCK instead of EAGAIN if a blocking
> lock request returns with NLM_LOCK_DENIED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
> CC: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> ---
> fs/lockd/clntproc.c | 10 +++++++++-
> fs/nfsd/lockd.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/lockd/clntproc.c 2008-05-15 17:54:30.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/lockd/clntproc.c 2008-05-15 17:59:41.000000000 +0200
> @@ -580,7 +580,15 @@ again:
> }
> if (status < 0)
> goto out_unlock;
> - status = nlm_stat_to_errno(resp->status);
> + /*
> + * EAGAIN doesn't make sense for sleeping locks, and in some
> + * cases NLM_LCK_DENIED is returned for a permanent error. So
Just for the sake of future readers, I might go ahead and give
specifics: "and older versions of the linux server sometimes returned
NLM_LCK_DENIED for permanent errors", or something.
> + * turn it into an ENOLCK.
> + */
> + if (resp->status == nlm_lck_denied && (fl_flags & FL_SLEEP))
> + status = -ENOLCK;
> + else
> + status = nlm_stat_to_errno(resp->status);
Might be a bit clearer (or at least make the comment and code more
obviously agree) to do:
status = nlm_stat_to_errno(resp->status);
if (status == -EAGAIN && (fl_flags & FL_SLEEP))
status = -ENOLCK;
This might make more sense as separate client and server-side patches.
Seems reasonable to me otherwise.
--b.
> out_unblock:
> nlmclnt_finish_block(block);
> out:
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/nfsd/lockd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/nfsd/lockd.c 2008-05-15 17:54:30.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/nfsd/lockd.c 2008-05-15 17:57:45.000000000 +0200
> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@
>
> #define NFSDDBG_FACILITY NFSDDBG_LOCKD
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKD_V4
> +#define nlm_stale_fh nlm4_stale_fh
> +#define nlm_failed nlm4_failed
> +#else
> +#define nlm_stale_fh nlm_lck_denied_nolocks
> +#define nlm_failed nlm_lck_denied_nolocks
> +#endif
> /*
> * Note: we hold the dentry use count while the file is open.
> */
> @@ -47,12 +54,10 @@ nlm_fopen(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct
> return 0;
> case nfserr_dropit:
> return nlm_drop_reply;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKD_V4
> case nfserr_stale:
> - return nlm4_stale_fh;
> -#endif
> + return nlm_stale_fh;
> default:
> - return nlm_lck_denied;
> + return nlm_failed;
> }
> }
>
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-15 19:50 [patch 0/9] file locking fixes + fuse nfs export support (v2) Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 1/9] lockd: dont return EAGAIN for a permanent error Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-20 18:47 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 2/9] locks: add special return value for asynchronous locks Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 3/9] locks: cleanup code duplication Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 4/9] locks: allow ->lock() to return FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 5/9] fuse: prepare lookup for nfs export Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 6/9] fuse: add export operations Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 7/9] fuse: add fuse_lookup_name() helper Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 8/9] fuse: nfs export special lookups Miklos Szeredi
2008-05-15 19:50 ` [patch 9/9] fuse: lockd support Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080520184710.GA8177@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).