linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@shaw.ca>,
	Kalpak Shah <Kalpak.Shah@sun.com>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 15:42:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080525194203.GB24328@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080525000148.GJ8325@wotan.suse.de>

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 05:01:48PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * FIEMAP_FLAG_HSM_READ
> If the extent is offline, retrieve it before mapping and do not flag
> it as FIEMAP_EXTENT_SECONDARY. This flag has no effect if the file
> system does not support HSM.

Given that there's no HSM support in mainline this should not be added.
It'll be useful once we add proper HSM support, though :)

> * FIEMAP_FLAG_LUN_ORDER
> If the file system stripes file data, this will return contiguous
> regions of physical allocation, sorted by LUN. Logical offsets may not
> make sense if this flag is passed. If the file system does not support
> multiple LUNs, this flag will be ignored.

A LUN doesn't make any sense in filesystem context.  That's a
scsi-centric acronym that doesn't even make sense in a scsi-centric
filesystem universe because a LUN can of course contain multiple
partitions.  It's also extremly ill-defined when using volume managers.

There's also no filesystems that actually support a single file on
multiple device in mainline, the only filesystem that supports multiple
data devices at all (XFS) requires each file to be on a single device.

Once we have a filesystem with real multiple data device support like
btrfs or a future XFS version we can worry about this and defined
a different ioctl for it.

> 
> Each extent is described by a single fiemap_extent structure as
> returned in fm_extents.
> 
> struct fiemap_extent {
> 	__u64	fe_logical;/* logical offset in bytes for the start of
> 			    * the extent */
> 	__u64	fe_physical; /* physical offset in bytes for the start
> 			      * of the extent */
> 	__u64	fe_length; /* length in bytes for the extent */
> 	__u32	fe_flags;  /* returned FIEMAP_EXTENT_* flags for the extent */
> 	__u32	fe_lun;	   /* logical device number for extent (starting at 0)*/

Again this lun thing is horribly ill-defined.  There is no such thing
as a logic device number in our filesystem terminology.

> struct fiemap_extent_info {
> 	unsigned int	fi_flags;		/* Flags as passed from user */
> 	unsigned int	fi_extents_mapped;	/* Number of mapped extents */
> 	unsigned int	fi_extents_max;		/* Size of fiemap_extent array */
> 	char		*fi_extents_start;	/* Start of fiemap_extent array */
> };

Why is this passes a structure instead of individual arguments?
Also why isn't fi_extents_start properly typed?

> If the request has the FIEMAP_FLAG_NUM_EXTENTS flag set, then calling
> this helper is not necessary and fi_extents_mapped can be set
> directly.

Sounds like the count number of extents request should be a separate
ioctl and separate filesystem entry point instead of overloading FIEMAP.

Just define a simple FIECOUNT ioctl.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-25 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-25  0:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl Mark Fasheh
2008-05-25 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-05-25 20:59   ` Brad Boyer
2008-05-26 10:59   ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-26 18:04     ` Brad Boyer
2008-05-27 16:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-27 21:10       ` Mark Fasheh
2008-05-27 13:48   ` Chris Mason
2008-05-27 16:21     ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-27 16:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-27 20:34         ` Joel Becker
2008-05-27 16:52     ` jim owens
2008-05-27 17:19       ` Chris Mason
2008-05-28 16:09         ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-28 16:33           ` Chris Mason
2008-05-29 22:01             ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-30 13:37               ` Chris Mason
2008-05-29 13:01           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 20:17             ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-27 18:56   ` Mark Fasheh
2008-05-27 20:31     ` Joel Becker
2008-05-27 20:49       ` Mark Fasheh
2008-05-28  5:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-28 16:02       ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-28 17:04         ` Joel Becker
2008-05-29  0:51           ` Dave Chinner
2008-05-29 13:02             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 15:33               ` jim owens
2008-05-29 15:53                 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-05-29 18:56                 ` Joel Becker
2008-05-29 21:41                   ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-29 21:47                     ` Joel Becker
2008-05-29 23:20                       ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-29  1:17           ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-29  5:55         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080525194203.GB24328@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=Kalpak.Shah@sun.com \
    --cc=adilger@shaw.ca \
    --cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).