From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@shaw.ca>,
Kalpak Shah <Kalpak.Shah@sun.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 15:42:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080525194203.GB24328@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080525000148.GJ8325@wotan.suse.de>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 05:01:48PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> * FIEMAP_FLAG_HSM_READ
> If the extent is offline, retrieve it before mapping and do not flag
> it as FIEMAP_EXTENT_SECONDARY. This flag has no effect if the file
> system does not support HSM.
Given that there's no HSM support in mainline this should not be added.
It'll be useful once we add proper HSM support, though :)
> * FIEMAP_FLAG_LUN_ORDER
> If the file system stripes file data, this will return contiguous
> regions of physical allocation, sorted by LUN. Logical offsets may not
> make sense if this flag is passed. If the file system does not support
> multiple LUNs, this flag will be ignored.
A LUN doesn't make any sense in filesystem context. That's a
scsi-centric acronym that doesn't even make sense in a scsi-centric
filesystem universe because a LUN can of course contain multiple
partitions. It's also extremly ill-defined when using volume managers.
There's also no filesystems that actually support a single file on
multiple device in mainline, the only filesystem that supports multiple
data devices at all (XFS) requires each file to be on a single device.
Once we have a filesystem with real multiple data device support like
btrfs or a future XFS version we can worry about this and defined
a different ioctl for it.
>
> Each extent is described by a single fiemap_extent structure as
> returned in fm_extents.
>
> struct fiemap_extent {
> __u64 fe_logical;/* logical offset in bytes for the start of
> * the extent */
> __u64 fe_physical; /* physical offset in bytes for the start
> * of the extent */
> __u64 fe_length; /* length in bytes for the extent */
> __u32 fe_flags; /* returned FIEMAP_EXTENT_* flags for the extent */
> __u32 fe_lun; /* logical device number for extent (starting at 0)*/
Again this lun thing is horribly ill-defined. There is no such thing
as a logic device number in our filesystem terminology.
> struct fiemap_extent_info {
> unsigned int fi_flags; /* Flags as passed from user */
> unsigned int fi_extents_mapped; /* Number of mapped extents */
> unsigned int fi_extents_max; /* Size of fiemap_extent array */
> char *fi_extents_start; /* Start of fiemap_extent array */
> };
Why is this passes a structure instead of individual arguments?
Also why isn't fi_extents_start properly typed?
> If the request has the FIEMAP_FLAG_NUM_EXTENTS flag set, then calling
> this helper is not necessary and fi_extents_mapped can be set
> directly.
Sounds like the count number of extents request should be a separate
ioctl and separate filesystem entry point instead of overloading FIEMAP.
Just define a simple FIECOUNT ioctl.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-25 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-25 0:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl Mark Fasheh
2008-05-25 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2008-05-25 20:59 ` Brad Boyer
2008-05-26 10:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-26 18:04 ` Brad Boyer
2008-05-27 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-27 21:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-05-27 13:48 ` Chris Mason
2008-05-27 16:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-05-27 16:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-27 20:34 ` Joel Becker
2008-05-27 16:52 ` jim owens
2008-05-27 17:19 ` Chris Mason
2008-05-28 16:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-28 16:33 ` Chris Mason
2008-05-29 22:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-30 13:37 ` Chris Mason
2008-05-29 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 20:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-27 18:56 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-05-27 20:31 ` Joel Becker
2008-05-27 20:49 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-05-28 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-28 16:02 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-28 17:04 ` Joel Becker
2008-05-29 0:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-05-29 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-05-29 15:33 ` jim owens
2008-05-29 15:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-05-29 18:56 ` Joel Becker
2008-05-29 21:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-29 21:47 ` Joel Becker
2008-05-29 23:20 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-29 1:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-05-29 5:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080525194203.GB24328@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Kalpak.Shah@sun.com \
--cc=adilger@shaw.ca \
--cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).