From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3] Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:17:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20080530131722.07f9723b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <482D4665.4050401@gmail.com> <48401E7E.9090304@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, drepper@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "Michael Kerrisk" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 May 2008 20:24:22 +0200 "Michael Kerrisk" wrote: > > After we fixed the original issue, we can still think about this other > > thing :) > > Okay, by now quite a bit of my time has been wasted, and my patience > is starting to get a little thin. Well yeah. This has been dragging on for ages. I was going to just apply this patch and stomp off again but this: "against 2.6.26rc2, with the 2008-05-19 git changes you sent me applied" stymied me. Please, if poss, just send a standalone, fully-changelogged, not-referential-to-some-random-email-discussion patch and let's get going. (Where's Ulrich, btw?)