From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc4 Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:35:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20080603103543.GS28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <47107.195.41.66.226.1212486572.squirrel@mail.jabbernet.dk> <20080603095713.GR28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Jesper Krogh Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:46530 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751925AbYFCKfs (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2008 06:35:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080603095713.GR28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:57:13AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:49:32AM +0200, Jesper Krogh wrote: > > > I reported it to the NFS-guys on a .22 kernel, and was directed to the > > fsdevel list(CC'ed again) back then. Now the problem is reproduces on > > .26-rc4 > > Lovely... Do you have the full oops trace, with the actual code > dump? FWIW, searching for graft_tree on arjan's site: #12419: negative dentry path->dentry #17367: ditto #17463: ditto #13042: probably the same (is that earlier oops you've mentioned?) #18932: WTF is that one doing there? (graft_tree is never mentioned in it) Nuts... I really don't see how that could happen, unless it's NFS revalidation playing silly buggers with dentries and ->d_revalidate() there ends up turning dentry passed to it into negative one... Where does the mountpoint in question live and what gets passed to sys_mount()?