From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: "Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: problem with kthread changes that went into cifs_demultiplex_thread
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:24:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080610132400.4283b36d@tleilax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524f69650806100841r4f90bd0k342c3264c8c64362@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:41:29 -0500
"Steve French" <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
> In working on the smb2 client implementation, I noticed that there is
> a problem with the revised kthread logic which takes down cifsd
> (cifs_demultiplex_thread) on umount or on abnormal socket termination
> during protocol negotiation. I noticed this while looking at SMB2
> since the Samba 4 SMB2 server was not handling the new SMB2 Negotiate
> protocol request (and unlike Windows Server 2008) and was closing the
> tcp session immediately after receiving the negprot request from the
> client. An unexpected error on negprot which causes the TCP session
> to close will cause cifsd to exit, but now this blocks forever at
> kthread_should_stop just after the main loop in
> cifs_demultiplex_thread.
Ok, I think I see what you're talking about. *sigh* -- and I just posted
the patch to make the kthread go to sleep to our internal mailing lists
this morning.
> The task doing mount is blocked in
> wait_event on the response_q but will never be woken up by cifsd (even
> though it would timeout if some one did wake it up once the 15 second
> timeout was expired). umount will never call kthread_stop because
> mount never succeeded - we do not have a tree connection yet (so tcon
> is null and we can't get to tcon->ses->server) and the failed mount
> won't call kthread_stop because it is stuck in wait_event with no one
> to wake up response_q.
>
> Adding a call to wake_up_all(&server->response_q) right after we set
> server->tcpStatus = CifsExiting at the end of the loop in
> cifs_demultiplex_thread but before we wait for kthread_stop works in
> my testing.
>
The solution sounds reasonable at first glance. Will you be pushing a
patch to your git tree for this soon?
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-10 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-10 15:41 problem with kthread changes that went into cifs_demultiplex_thread Steve French
2008-06-10 17:24 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2008-06-10 21:40 ` Steve French
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080610132400.4283b36d@tleilax.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).