From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERTEmbedded.de>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "r/o bind mounts" patch in 2.6.26-rc6 changes (breaks?) error behaviour
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:21:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080624182132.GH5642@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213971466.7512.17.camel@nimitz>
On Fri 2008-06-20 07:17:46, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 12:16 +0200, Jens Rottmann wrote:
> >
> > I noticed the following change in the error behaviour when attempting
> > to delete nonexisting files/dirs from R/O-mounted directories:
> >
> > Linux 2.6.25.7:
> > rm /RO_mounted_path/nonexisting_file
> > ==> "No such file or directory"
> >
> > Linux 2.6.26-rc6-git6:
> > rm /RO_mounted_path/nonexisting_file
> > ==> "Read-only file system"
>
> We looked at this way back in the beginning when I started to work on
> the patches. It was decided that the error codes weren't horribly
> important. We did have a case a bit ago where it really mattered, and
> Al fixed that up.
>
> I know this changed behavior a bit, but userspace can surely work around
> it with read-only operations (stat) when it is really important to get
> the error to the user just right.
I'd say userspace should not have to work around this.
Interface change, in stable series, w/o deprecation period, new
interface is worse than the old one...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <485B8361.6010708@LiPPERTEmbedded.de>
2008-06-20 14:17 ` "r/o bind mounts" patch in 2.6.26-rc6 changes (breaks?) error behaviour Dave Hansen
2008-06-20 15:28 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-20 16:14 ` Jens Rottmann
2008-06-24 18:21 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080624182132.GH5642@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=JRottmann@LiPPERTEmbedded.de \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).