From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@shaw.ca>,
Kalpak Shah <Kalpak.Shah@sun.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl - round 2
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:24:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080626102403.GN6239@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080626093634.GA30025@shareable.org>
On Jun 26, 2008 10:36 +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Mark Fasheh wrote:
> > * FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC
> > If this flag is set, the kernel will sync the file before mapping extents.
>
> Is there a reason why fsync() before calling FIEMAP is unsuitable?
This was added because the xfsbmap operation always did an fsync before
returning the extents. I don't think it is strictly required, but it
isn't harmful either.
> > * FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR
> > If this flag is set, the extents returned will describe the inodes
> > extended attribute lookup tree, instead of it's data tree.
>
> What is this for? The meaning of the xattr tree sounds rather
> filesystem specific to me.
This is to return the location of the xattr blocks for the inode.
> > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_DIRECT
> > Direct access to the data in this extent is illegal or will have
> > undefined results.
> ...
> > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_NET
> > - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_DIRECT
> > The data for this extent is not stored in a locally-accessible device.
>
> Does this _always_ set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_DIRECT? Some network
> filesystems do support O_DIRECT access - NFS comes to mind.
>
> (I'm assuming 'direct access' means O_DIRECT).
"NO_DIRECT" has nothing to do with "O_DIRECT". It just means that,
per the description a few lines earlier, direct access to the file
data is impossible (i.e. for lilo or other tool which thinks it can
open "dev" and seek to "fe_physical" to read the data), or at best
will have undefined results (e.g. you may get encrypted or compressed
data back, or it is on the far side of a network interface).
> > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_ENCRYPTED
> > - This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_DIRECT
> > The data in this extent has been encrypted by the file system.
>
> I don't think encryption necessarily rules out O_DIRECT. It'll depend
> how I/O is implemented by that filesystem.
>
> > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_INLINE
> > This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> > Data is located within a meta data block.
>
> This seems like it would always set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_DIRECT :-)
>
> (Generally, won't FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED always set
> FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_DIRECT?)
>
> > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_TAIL
> > This will also set FIEMAP_EXTENT_NOT_ALIGNED
> > Data is packed into a block with data from other files.
>
> Maybe this too.
The rest of these comments seem based on the previous misunderstanding.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 22:18 [PATCH 0/4] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl - round 2 Mark Fasheh
2008-06-26 3:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-26 9:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 10:24 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2008-06-26 11:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-06-26 12:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 13:16 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-26 13:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 13:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 14:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 16:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-29 19:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-06-29 21:45 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-30 22:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-30 23:07 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-07-01 2:01 ` Brad Boyer
2008-07-02 6:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-02 6:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-02 14:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 17:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-26 14:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-27 1:41 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27 9:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-27 10:01 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27 10:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-27 22:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-28 4:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-07-02 6:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-02 14:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-02 21:20 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-07-03 14:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 14:04 ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-26 14:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 14:27 ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-07-02 23:48 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 11:17 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-03 12:11 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-04 8:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-04 12:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-07 7:40 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-07 16:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-07 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-07 21:16 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 3:01 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-07 22:02 ` jim owens
2008-07-09 2:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-03 12:21 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 12:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 20:32 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-07-05 10:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-05 21:44 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-07-07 23:01 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 1:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-08 13:02 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 14:03 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 14:39 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 14:30 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-09 1:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 17:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-03 14:37 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 15:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-04 8:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-04 11:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-03 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-04 9:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-07 23:28 ` jim owens
2008-07-09 1:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-09 15:01 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 0:06 ` jim owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080626102403.GN6239@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=Kalpak.Shah@sun.com \
--cc=adilger@shaw.ca \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).