From: Takashi Sato <t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com>
To: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk" <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"mtk.manpages@googlemail.com" <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] freeze feature ver 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:20:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080630212005t-sato@mail.jp.nec.com> (raw)
Hi Andrew and Alexander,
I've addressed Andrew's comments in these patches.
Please see my previous mail for details of changes.
But only following change is different from my previous mail.
I wrote:
>>> +void del_freeze_timeout(struct block_device *bdev)
>>> +{
>>> + if (delayed_work_pending(&bdev->bd_freeze_timeout))
>>
>> Is this test needed?
>
> It's not necessary because cancel_delayed_work_sync checks it itself.
> I will remove it.
It's possible that the delayed work task (freeze_timeout()) calls
del_freeze_timeout(). If the delayed work task calls
cancel_delayed_work_sync() to delete itself, a deadlock will occur.
So we need the test of delayed_work_pending().
Currently, ext3 in mainline Linux doesn't have the freeze feature which
suspends write requests. So, we cannot take a backup which keeps
the filesystem's consistency with the storage device's features
(snapshot and replication) while it is mounted.
In many case, a commercial filesystem (e.g. VxFS) has
the freeze feature and it would be used to get the consistent backup.
If Linux's standard filesytem ext3 has the freeze feature, we can do it
without a commercial filesystem.
So I have implemented the ioctls of the freeze feature.
I think we can take the consistent backup with the following steps.
1. Freeze the filesystem with the freeze ioctl.
2. Separate the replication volume or create the snapshot
with the storage device's feature.
3. Unfreeze the filesystem with the unfreeze ioctl.
4. Take the backup from the separated replication volume
or the snapshot.
[PATCH 1/3] Implement generic freeze feature
I have modified to set the suitable error number (EOPNOTSUPP)
in case the filesystem doesn't support the freeze feature.
The ioctls for the generic freeze feature are below.
o Freeze the filesystem
int ioctl(int fd, int FIFREEZE, arg)
fd: The file descriptor of the mountpoint
FIFREEZE: request code for the freeze
arg: Ignored
Return value: 0 if the operation succeeds. Otherwise, -1
o Unfreeze the filesystem
int ioctl(int fd, int FITHAW, arg)
fd: The file descriptor of the mountpoint
FITHAW: request code for unfreeze
arg: Ignored
Return value: 0 if the operation succeeds. Otherwise, -1
[PATCH 2/3] Remove XFS specific ioctl interfaces for freeze feature
It removes XFS specific ioctl interfaces and request codes
for freeze feature.
This patch has been supplied by David Chinner.
[PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
The timeout feature is added to freeze ioctl. And new ioctl
to reset the timeout period is added.
o Freeze the filesystem
int ioctl(int fd, int FIFREEZE, long *timeout_sec)
fd: The file descriptor of the mountpoint
FIFREEZE: request code for the freeze
timeout_sec: the timeout period in seconds
If it's 0 or 1, the timeout isn't set.
This special case of "1" is implemented to keep
the compatibility with XFS applications.
Return value: 0 if the operation succeeds. Otherwise, -1
o Reset the timeout period
This is useful for the application to set the timeout_sec more accurately.
For example, the freezer resets the timeout_sec to 10 seconds every 5
seconds. In this approach, even if the freezer causes a deadlock
by accessing the frozen filesystem, it will be solved by the timeout
in 10 seconds and the freezer can recognize that at the next reset
of timeout_sec.
int ioctl(int fd, int FIFREEZE_RESET_TIMEOUT, long *timeout_sec)
fd:file descriptor of mountpoint
FIFREEZE_RESET_TIMEOUT: request code for reset of timeout period
timeout_sec: new timeout period in seconds
Return value: 0 if the operation succeeds. Otherwise, -1
Error number: If the filesystem has already been unfrozen,
errno is set to EINVAL.
Any comments are very welcome.
Cheers, Takashi
next reply other threads:[~2008-06-30 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-30 12:20 Takashi Sato [this message]
2008-06-30 13:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] freeze feature ver 1.8 Alasdair G Kergon
2008-07-01 9:12 ` [dm-devel] " Takashi Sato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080630212005t-sato@mail.jp.nec.com \
--to=t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@googlemail.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).