linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (resend) reuse xxx_fifo_fops for xxx_pipe_fops
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:16:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807011416.09848.vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807011411.25411.vda.linux@googlemail.com>

On Tuesday 01 July 2008 14:11, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2008 10:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 12:03:50 +0200 Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I think since XXX_pipe_fops are only used in this file,
> > > just explaining this in the comment would be enough.
> > 
> > no, a comment is only needed when the code is unobvious.  Make
> > the code obvious and we don't need a comment.
> > 
> > As Christoph pointed out, open-coding shared_read_fops everywhere
> > might make sense too.  It'd make it harder to unshare them later
> > on, but that's pretty improbable.
> 
> Ok.

And this one is even better [because it actually compiles :) ].
I forgot to change fs.h - XXX_pipefifo_fops live there.

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
--
vda

--- linux-2.6.26-rc8/fs.org/fifo.c	Thu Apr 17 04:49:44 2008
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc8/fs/fifo.c	Tue Jul  1 14:09:13 2008
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
 	 *  POSIX.1 says that O_NONBLOCK means return with the FIFO
 	 *  opened, even when there is no process writing the FIFO.
 	 */
-		filp->f_op = &read_fifo_fops;
+		filp->f_op = &read_pipefifo_fops;
 		pipe->r_counter++;
 		if (pipe->readers++ == 0)
 			wake_up_partner(inode);
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
 		if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) && !pipe->readers)
 			goto err;
 
-		filp->f_op = &write_fifo_fops;
+		filp->f_op = &write_pipefifo_fops;
 		pipe->w_counter++;
 		if (!pipe->writers++)
 			wake_up_partner(inode);
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
 	 *  This implementation will NEVER block on a O_RDWR open, since
 	 *  the process can at least talk to itself.
 	 */
-		filp->f_op = &rdwr_fifo_fops;
+		filp->f_op = &rdwr_pipefifo_fops;
 
 		pipe->readers++;
 		pipe->writers++;
@@ -151,5 +151,5 @@
  * depending on the access mode of the file...
  */
 const struct file_operations def_fifo_fops = {
-	.open		= fifo_open,	/* will set read or write pipe_fops */
+	.open		= fifo_open,	/* will set read_ or write_pipefifo_fops */
 };
--- linux-2.6.26-rc8/fs.org/pipe.c	Tue Jul  1 11:52:28 2008
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc8/fs/pipe.c	Tue Jul  1 14:08:16 2008
@@ -777,8 +777,10 @@
 /*
  * The file_operations structs are not static because they
  * are also used in linux/fs/fifo.c to do operations on FIFOs.
+ *
+ * Pipes reuse fifos' file_operations structs.
  */
-const struct file_operations read_fifo_fops = {
+const struct file_operations read_pipefifo_fops = {
 	.llseek		= no_llseek,
 	.read		= do_sync_read,
 	.aio_read	= pipe_read,
@@ -790,7 +792,7 @@
 	.fasync		= pipe_read_fasync,
 };
 
-const struct file_operations write_fifo_fops = {
+const struct file_operations write_pipefifo_fops = {
 	.llseek		= no_llseek,
 	.read		= bad_pipe_r,
 	.write		= do_sync_write,
@@ -802,7 +804,7 @@
 	.fasync		= pipe_write_fasync,
 };
 
-const struct file_operations rdwr_fifo_fops = {
+const struct file_operations rdwr_pipefifo_fops = {
 	.llseek		= no_llseek,
 	.read		= do_sync_read,
 	.aio_read	= pipe_read,
@@ -815,43 +817,6 @@
 	.fasync		= pipe_rdwr_fasync,
 };
 
-static const struct file_operations read_pipe_fops = {
-	.llseek		= no_llseek,
-	.read		= do_sync_read,
-	.aio_read	= pipe_read,
-	.write		= bad_pipe_w,
-	.poll		= pipe_poll,
-	.unlocked_ioctl	= pipe_ioctl,
-	.open		= pipe_read_open,
-	.release	= pipe_read_release,
-	.fasync		= pipe_read_fasync,
-};
-
-static const struct file_operations write_pipe_fops = {
-	.llseek		= no_llseek,
-	.read		= bad_pipe_r,
-	.write		= do_sync_write,
-	.aio_write	= pipe_write,
-	.poll		= pipe_poll,
-	.unlocked_ioctl	= pipe_ioctl,
-	.open		= pipe_write_open,
-	.release	= pipe_write_release,
-	.fasync		= pipe_write_fasync,
-};
-
-static const struct file_operations rdwr_pipe_fops = {
-	.llseek		= no_llseek,
-	.read		= do_sync_read,
-	.aio_read	= pipe_read,
-	.write		= do_sync_write,
-	.aio_write	= pipe_write,
-	.poll		= pipe_poll,
-	.unlocked_ioctl	= pipe_ioctl,
-	.open		= pipe_rdwr_open,
-	.release	= pipe_rdwr_release,
-	.fasync		= pipe_rdwr_fasync,
-};
-
 struct pipe_inode_info * alloc_pipe_info(struct inode *inode)
 {
 	struct pipe_inode_info *pipe;
@@ -927,7 +892,7 @@
 	inode->i_pipe = pipe;
 
 	pipe->readers = pipe->writers = 1;
-	inode->i_fop = &rdwr_pipe_fops;
+	inode->i_fop = &rdwr_pipefifo_fops;
 
 	/*
 	 * Mark the inode dirty from the very beginning,
@@ -978,7 +943,7 @@
 	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
 
 	err = -ENFILE;
-	f = alloc_file(pipe_mnt, dentry, FMODE_WRITE, &write_pipe_fops);
+	f = alloc_file(pipe_mnt, dentry, FMODE_WRITE, &write_pipefifo_fops);
 	if (!f)
 		goto err_dentry;
 	f->f_mapping = inode->i_mapping;
@@ -1021,7 +986,7 @@
 
 	f->f_pos = 0;
 	f->f_flags = O_RDONLY;
-	f->f_op = &read_pipe_fops;
+	f->f_op = &read_pipefifo_fops;
 	f->f_mode = FMODE_READ;
 	f->f_version = 0;
 
--- linux-2.6.26-rc8/include.org/linux/fs.h	Mon Jun 30 15:45:56 2008
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc8/include/linux/fs.h	Tue Jul  1 14:13:22 2008
@@ -1687,9 +1687,9 @@
 extern void make_bad_inode(struct inode *);
 extern int is_bad_inode(struct inode *);
 
-extern const struct file_operations read_fifo_fops;
-extern const struct file_operations write_fifo_fops;
-extern const struct file_operations rdwr_fifo_fops;
+extern const struct file_operations read_pipefifo_fops;
+extern const struct file_operations write_pipefifo_fops;
+extern const struct file_operations rdwr_pipefifo_fops;
 
 extern int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block *);
 

      reply	other threads:[~2008-07-01 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-01  9:03 [PATCH] (resend) reuse xxx_fifo_fops for xxx_pipe_fops Denys Vlasenko
2008-07-01  7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-01  7:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-01 10:03   ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-07-01  8:10     ` Andrew Morton
2008-07-01  8:15       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-07-01 12:11       ` Denys Vlasenko
2008-07-01 12:16         ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807011416.09848.vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).