From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@shaw.ca>,
Kalpak Shah <Kalpak.Shah@sun.com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl - round 2
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:26:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080702062612.GP6239@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4865BC50.2030804@redhat.com>
On Jun 27, 2008 23:21 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> even w/ metadata out of the way the ext4 extent format is still
> capped at 128M per extent right, even if they're contiguous. Which led
> me to the little though experiment about hm, is this 1G file 1 extent or
> 8 and what should fiemap return...
The current FIEMAP code will return 8 extents, which mirrors the number
of physical extents on disk. This could be important to the person
looking at the file, as it will be clear that there are too many
extents to fit into the inode and the extent tree will include an index
block.
I was a bit on the fence about this, but I agree with David that if
userspace has more information (e.g. all of the on-disk extent data)
it can always merge it, but it can't "un-merge" the data returned
from the kernel.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-02 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 22:18 [PATCH 0/4] Fiemap, an extent mapping ioctl - round 2 Mark Fasheh
2008-06-26 3:03 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-26 9:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 10:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-26 11:37 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-06-26 12:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 13:16 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-26 13:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 13:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 14:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 16:56 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-29 19:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-06-29 21:45 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-30 22:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-30 23:07 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-07-01 2:01 ` Brad Boyer
2008-07-02 6:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-02 6:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-02 14:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 17:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-26 14:03 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-27 1:41 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27 9:41 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-27 10:01 ` Dave Chinner
2008-06-27 10:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-27 22:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-28 4:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-07-02 6:26 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2008-07-02 14:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-02 21:20 ` Mark Fasheh
2008-07-03 14:45 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 14:04 ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-06-26 14:15 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-26 14:27 ` Dave Kleikamp
2008-07-02 23:48 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 11:17 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-03 12:11 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-04 8:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-04 12:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-07 7:40 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-07 16:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-07 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-07 21:16 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 3:01 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-07 22:02 ` jim owens
2008-07-09 2:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-03 12:21 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 12:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 20:32 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-07-05 10:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-05 21:44 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2008-07-07 23:01 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 1:51 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-08 13:02 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 14:03 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 14:39 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 14:30 ` Theodore Tso
2008-07-09 1:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-06-26 17:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-03 14:37 ` jim owens
2008-07-03 15:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-04 8:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-04 11:28 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-03 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2008-07-04 9:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-07-07 23:28 ` jim owens
2008-07-09 1:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-07-09 15:01 ` jim owens
2008-07-08 0:06 ` jim owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080702062612.GP6239@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=Kalpak.Shah@sun.com \
--cc=adilger@shaw.ca \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=jbacik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).