From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:16:21 -0400
Message-ID: <20080709061621.GA5260@infradead.org>
References: <20080630212450t-sato@mail.jp.nec.com> <20080701081026.GB16691@infradead.org> <20080707110730.GG5643@ucw.cz> <20080708231026.GP11558@disturbed> <20080708232031.GE18195@elf.ucw.cz> <20080709005254.GQ11558@disturbed> <20080709010922.GE9957@mit.edu> <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, pavel@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org,
	t-sato@yk.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, mtk.manpages@googlemail.com
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1KGSvZ-0006dB-53@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> This would mean that freeze and thaw will have to be done on the same
> file descriptor, but this isn't unreasonable to expect, is it?

It is certainly not the current use case, where you run one command
to freeze the filesystem and another one to unfreeze it.