From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Remove a few inlines in fs/namei.c Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20080729185537.GI28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20080729155229.489904417@free-electrons.com>> <20080729155527.799486507@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: Thomas Petazzoni Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:44456 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063AbYG2Szi (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:55:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080729155527.799486507@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 05:52:31PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Uninline may_create() and do_follow_link() and use vfs_follow_link() > instead of __vfs_follow_link() in __do_follow_link(). It allows to > slightly reduce the size of kernel code: > > text data bss dec hex filename > 1114299 118564 212992 1445855 160fdf vmlinux.old > 1112971 118564 212992 1444527 160aaf vmlinux > -1328 0 0 -1328 -530 +/- > > This patch is part of the Linux Tiny project and has been originally > written by Matt Mackall Absolutely not. do_follow_link() et.al. are parts of mutual recursion loop and we need to reduce the use of kernel *stack*.