From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gilad@codefidence.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [BLOCK] Add 'discard' request handling
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:20:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080808112044.GQ20055@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218193485.12232.116.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
On Fri, Aug 08 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:49 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > This is what I came up with. You don't need the request discard flag,
> > since you are using a specific request type for this. Additionally, we
> > can move the request init where it is done for fs requests
> > (init_req_from_bio) and get it set there.
>
> Hmmm. (qv)
>
> > I also added the small bits for merging.
>
> Nice. I was _hoping_ it would be that easy, but didn't want to get
> involved with that yet. One tweak we might want to make to that would be
> to allow discard requests to be _dropped_ if there's a subsequent write
> to the same sectors -- if we expect it to be common that we deallocate
> sectors then re-use them again before the discard request hits the disk,
> that might be an interesting optimisation.
Merging should be fairly easy, for discarding discard (ahem) requests,
you would need to check for overlap. The merging doesn't do that, it'll
only look for boundary matches. So it would require some extra logic and
either runtime cost and/or an additional data structure to track that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <488B7281.4020007@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20080726130200.f541e604.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-08-05 1:45 ` [RFC] 'discard sectors' block request David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 1:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-05 9:01 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 11:42 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-05 13:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 14:21 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-08-05 16:29 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 17:25 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] [BLOCK] Add 'discard' request handling David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 16:19 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 18:18 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 19:28 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-07 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/5, v2] " David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 9:33 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 10:49 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:04 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:20 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-08-08 10:52 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:09 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:29 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:44 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:47 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:05 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 12:13 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:49 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-10 1:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-08 15:32 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 14:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-08 14:27 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 14:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] [FAT] Let the block device know when sectors can be discarded David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 16:40 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 17:14 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 18:11 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 19:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 19:50 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 20:10 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 21:37 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 16:09 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/5, v2] " David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] [MTD] Support 'discard sectors' operation in translation layer support core David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] [MTD] [FTL] Support 'discard sectors' operation David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] [BLOCK] Fix up comments about matching flags between bio and rq David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080808112044.GQ20055@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gilad@codefidence.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).