linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gilad@codefidence.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] [BLOCK] Add 'discard' request handling
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:13:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080808121302.GT20055@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218197116.12232.135.camel@pmac.infradead.org>

On Fri, Aug 08 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 13:44 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> > Sigh indeed, ->issue_flush_fn() was the actual issuer, not the preparer.
> > Let me send a new diff. This adds the ->prepare_discard_fn() to do the
> > transformation, and also extends blkdev_issue_flush() to return error if
> > the IO was never queued because of some device in the stack not
> > supporting it.
> 
> I think we still want the DISCARD flag in rq->cmd_flags. We can't rely
> on rq->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_DISCARD because that may well be changed to
> something else (like REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC).

It's getting a bit nasty at this point. Discard requests should be
treated as file system requests, if you want merging and sorting on
them. For file system requests, drivers do the transformation inside the
driver once it receives the request. They don't change types in-flight,
they always stay the same.

So either we do the same for discard requests, or we treat them as we
would a REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC on insert. That means doing the transformation
first, then insert the request with elv_add_request(). That would be a
the end of the queue, so it would not either pass or get passed by file
system requests. You would not get merging in this case.

> I was thinking of REQ_TYPE_DISCARD as a special case for some block
> devices, just as REQ_TYPE_FLUSH is a special case for the ps3disk.c
> driver (nobody else uses it). In fact, perhaps both of them should be
> switched to REQ_TYPE_LINUX_BLOCK or REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL?

SPECIAL should go away, it has no definitive meaning. If we choose the
number two option above, it should just be a REQ_TYPE_LINUX_BLOCK with
the "official" cdb of REQ_LB_OP_DISCARD. It would behave the same that
approach.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-08 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <488B7281.4020007@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20080726130200.f541e604.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-08-05  1:45   ` [RFC] 'discard sectors' block request David Woodhouse
2008-08-05  1:59     ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-05  9:01       ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 11:42     ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-05 13:32       ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 14:21         ` Ric Wheeler
2008-08-05 16:29       ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-05 17:25         ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06  9:25           ` [PATCH 1/5] [BLOCK] Add 'discard' request handling David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 16:19             ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 18:18               ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 19:28                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-07 16:32             ` [PATCH 1/5, v2] " David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 18:41             ` [PATCH 1/5] " Jens Axboe
2008-08-08  9:33               ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 10:30                 ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 10:49                   ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:04                     ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:20                       ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 10:52                   ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:09                     ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:18                       ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:29                         ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 11:44                           ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 11:47                             ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:05                             ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 12:13                               ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-08-08 12:32                                 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 12:37                                   ` Jens Axboe
2008-08-08 12:49                                     ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-10  1:05                                       ` Jamie Lokier
2008-08-08 15:32                             ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 14:22                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-08 14:27                       ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-08 14:34                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-06  9:25           ` [PATCH 2/5] [FAT] Let the block device know when sectors can be discarded David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 16:40             ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 17:14               ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 18:11               ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-06 19:10                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 19:50                   ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 20:10                     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2008-08-06 21:37                   ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 16:09                     ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-07 16:33             ` [PATCH 2/5, v2] " David Woodhouse
2008-08-06  9:25           ` [PATCH 3/5] [MTD] Support 'discard sectors' operation in translation layer support core David Woodhouse
2008-08-06  9:25           ` [PATCH 4/5] [MTD] [FTL] Support 'discard sectors' operation David Woodhouse
2008-08-06  9:25           ` [PATCH 5/5] [BLOCK] Fix up comments about matching flags between bio and rq David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080808121302.GT20055@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gilad@codefidence.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).