linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve buffered streaming write ordering
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:44:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081002124433.f6612036.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081002181856.GB29613@skywalker>

On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 23:48:56 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > 
> > For a 4.5GB streaming buffered write, this printk inside
> > ext4_da_writepage shows up 37,2429 times in /var/log/messages.
> > 
> 
> Part of that can happen due to shrink_page_list -> pageout -> writepagee
> call back with lots of unallocated buffer_heads(blocks).

That workload shouldn't be using that code path much at all.  It's
supposed to be the case that pdflush and balance_dirty_pages() do most
of the writeback work.

And that _used_ to be the case, but we broke it.  It happened several
years ago and I wasn't able to provoke anyone into finding out why. 
iirc the XFS guys noticed it because their throughput was fairly badly
affected.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-02 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-01 18:40 [PATCH] Improve buffered streaming write ordering Chris Mason
2008-10-02  4:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-02 12:20   ` Chris Mason
2008-10-02 16:12     ` Chris Mason
2008-10-02 18:18     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-02 19:44       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-02 23:43       ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-03 19:45         ` Chris Mason
2008-10-06 10:16           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-06 14:21             ` Chris Mason
2008-10-07  8:45               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-07  9:05                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-07 10:02                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-10-07 13:29                     ` Theodore Tso
2008-10-07 13:36                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-07 14:46                         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-07 13:55                     ` Peter Staubach
2008-10-07 14:38                       ` Chuck Lever
2008-10-09 15:11         ` Chris Mason
2008-10-10  5:13           ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-03  1:11       ` Chris Mason
2008-10-03  2:43         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-03 12:07           ` Chris Mason
2008-10-02 18:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081002124433.f6612036.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).