From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: Sending patches, against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what? Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:38:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20081022153808.GC25283@logfs.org> References: <48FEAD30.3090906@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20081021231757.7cf40e23.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Phillip Lougher , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Linux Kernel Development , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081021231757.7cf40e23.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 October 2008 23:17:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >=20 > A much bigger > task is getting them reviewed and generally getting a bit of > momentum/interest/enthusiasm/etc. How much of that is needed? Squashfs is very widely used and the current work is _much_ better than it used to be. There is some work remaining to be done, but the current format appears sane. I'd vote to merge this fairly soon. J=C3=B6rn --=20 All art is but imitation of nature. -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca