From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
autofs@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:31:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081027133131.f2011d28.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081023023522.4508.27987.stgit@raven.themaw.net>
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:35:22 +0800
Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
> Remove unnecessary string terminator check.
Why is it unnecessary?
Does this change alter behaviour in any way?
Does it fix a bug?
Better changelogs, please....
> --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> @@ -51,18 +51,6 @@ static int check_name(const char *name)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Check a string doesn't overrun the chunk of
> - * memory we copied from user land.
> - */
> -static int invalid_str(char *str, void *end)
> -{
> - while ((void *) str <= end)
> - if (!*str++)
> - return 0;
> - return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -
> -/*
> * Check that the user compiled against correct version of autofs
> * misc device code.
> *
> @@ -143,14 +131,6 @@ static int validate_dev_ioctl(int cmd, struct autofs_dev_ioctl *param)
> cmd);
> goto out;
> }
> -
> - err = invalid_str(param->path,
> - (void *) ((size_t) param + param->size));
> - if (err) {
> - AUTOFS_WARN("invalid path supplied for cmd(0x%08x)",
> - cmd);
> - goto out;
> - }
> }
>
> err = 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-27 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 2:35 [PATCH 1/6] autofs4 - correct offset mount expire check Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] autofs4 - remove string terminator check Ian Kent
2008-10-27 20:31 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-28 0:27 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 0:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28 1:04 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 1:02 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] autofs4 - collect version check return Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] autofs4 - make autofs type usage explicit Ian Kent
2008-10-27 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-28 0:28 ` Ian Kent
2008-10-28 13:24 ` Jeff Moyer
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] autofs4 - improve parameter usage Ian Kent
2008-10-23 2:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] autofs4 - cleanup expire code duplication Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081027133131.f2011d28.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).