From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: npiggin@suse.de Subject: [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:47:15 +1100 Message-ID: <20081028144715.683011000@suse.de> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner , Chris Mason To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59486 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752907AbYJ1PBL (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:01:11 -0400 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: OK, I'm happier with this patchset now. Note that I've taken your patch and mangled it a bit at the end of the series. This one survives and seems to run OK here, but I'm mainly doing dumb stress testing with a handful of filesystems, and data-io error injection testing. There are a lot of combinations of ways this function can operate and interact obviously, so it would be helpful to get more review. Chris, would you possibly have time to run your btrfs tests that are sensitive to problems in this code? I could provide you a single patch rollup against mainline if it helps. --