From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ext4: fix big endian Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:33:27 -0500 Message-ID: <20081106173327.GF18939@mit.edu> References: <200811061600.54264.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200811061651.49602.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <49131601.50407@redhat.com> <20081106163846.GA1381@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Staubach , Christian Borntraeger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from www.church-of-our-saviour.org ([69.25.196.31]:38587 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750903AbYKFRe7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2008 12:34:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081106163846.GA1381@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:38:46AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Yes. And if someone ran sparse over the code both the initial error > and this varaint would be trivial to spot.. > That's how Aneesh found it. :-) - Ted