From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: poll: allow f_op->poll to sleep, take #3 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:34:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20081123093420.GN30453@elte.hu> References: <20081122123942.GF5707@parisc-linux.org> <4927FE87.6050005@gmail.com> <20081122105356.87856d04.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4928B162.9030404@gmail.com> <20081123085902.GI30453@elte.hu> <49291F06.5040907@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Davide Libenzi , Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , Miklos Szeredi , arjan@linux.intel.com, Linus Torvalds , hch@infradead.org, rminnich@sandia.gov, ericvh@gmail.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46178 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751723AbYKWJel (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:34:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49291F06.5040907@gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Tejun Heo wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> > >>> +static int pollwake(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct poll_wqueues *pwq = wait->private; > >>> + DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(dummy_wait, pwq->polling_task); > >>> + > >>> + set_mb(pwq->triggered, 1); > >>> + > >>> + /* perform the default wake up operation */ > >>> + return default_wake_function(&dummy_wait, mode, sync, key); > >>> +} > >> Wouldn't it be nicer to un-static try_to_wake_up() (or a wrapper) > >> instead of setting up a fake wait queue just to use > >> default_wake_function(), just to wake up a task? > > > > the already existing single-task-wakeup shortcut method made available > > by the scheduler is wake_up_process(). A number of primitives where > > waitqueue overhead is of concern already make use of it. > > (mutexes/rtmutexes and more) > > > > if you need a different mode flag, then please extend the > > wake_up_process() family of APIs. > > Well, the problem is that for wait wake up functions @mode and @sync > are passed as parameter and should be passed over to actual wake up > function as-is, if I add @mode and @sync to wake_up_process() family > of APIs, it's just try_to_wake_up(). _sync() is not something that should normally be done from poll handlers. But ->poll() handlers should all be TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, right? So wake_up_process_interruptible() should be the thing you need? Anyway, if you really want to pass in a state filter, you can use the already existing wake_up_state() method as well. Ingo