linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/3 BUG,RFC] ext3: release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:51:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124055133.GB20928@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081120093450.c87b39ef.toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>

Hi Toshijuki,

My apologizes for not getting back to you sooner.  My travel schedule
has been a little crazy lately, including being in Japan last week
speaking at the Japan Linux Symposium.

Your patch series looks good, but I have one comment, for the ext3 and
ext4 patches:

> +	if (journal != NULL)
> +		return journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal, page, wait);
> +	else
> +		return try_to_free_buffers(page);

According to the documentation for journal_try_to_free_buffers():

 * This function returns non-zero if we wish try_to_free_buffers()
 * to be called. We do this if the page is releasable by try_to_free_buffers().
 * We also do it if the page has locked or dirty buffers and the caller wants
 * us to perform sync or async writeout.

So I think the last conditional in ext3_release_metadata() needs to be
changed to be like this:

+	if ((journal != NULL) && 
+	    (journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal, page, wait) == 0))
+		return 0;
+	return try_to_free_buffers(page);

A similar change should be made in the ext4 version of the patch.
Does that sound OK to you?

Regards,

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-20  0:34 [RESEND][PATCH 2/3 BUG,RFC] ext3: release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-24  5:51 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-11-25  1:00   ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-25  4:09     ` Toshiyuki Okajima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081124055133.GB20928@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).