From: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
sct@redhat.com, adilger@sun.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 2/3 BUG,RFC] ext3: release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:51:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081124055133.GB20928@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081120093450.c87b39ef.toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Toshijuki,
My apologizes for not getting back to you sooner. My travel schedule
has been a little crazy lately, including being in Japan last week
speaking at the Japan Linux Symposium.
Your patch series looks good, but I have one comment, for the ext3 and
ext4 patches:
> + if (journal != NULL)
> + return journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal, page, wait);
> + else
> + return try_to_free_buffers(page);
According to the documentation for journal_try_to_free_buffers():
* This function returns non-zero if we wish try_to_free_buffers()
* to be called. We do this if the page is releasable by try_to_free_buffers().
* We also do it if the page has locked or dirty buffers and the caller wants
* us to perform sync or async writeout.
So I think the last conditional in ext3_release_metadata() needs to be
changed to be like this:
+ if ((journal != NULL) &&
+ (journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal, page, wait) == 0))
+ return 0;
+ return try_to_free_buffers(page);
A similar change should be made in the ext4 version of the patch.
Does that sound OK to you?
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-24 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-20 0:34 [RESEND][PATCH 2/3 BUG,RFC] ext3: release block-device-mapping buffer_heads which have the filesystem private data for avoiding oom-killer Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-24 5:51 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2008-11-25 1:00 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2008-11-25 4:09 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081124055133.GB20928@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=toshi.okajima@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).