From: Karel Zak <kzak-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: util-linux-ng-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: mount(8) manpage and filesystem-specific options
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:54:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126105444.GO2961@nb.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081126041558.GA9251-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:15:58PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently the mount(8) manpages which is contained inside util-linux
> has a list of mount options for various filesystem. Now the filesystems
> are in the kernel tree and can change options without affecting the
> mount binary, and of course do so frequently. This means these options
> are frequently out of date. All these options also make the manpage
Yes, you're right.
> quite large and harder to read. What do peope think about adding a
> (section 4?) manpage for every common filesystem in the man-pages
Something like this is on my wish list for long time ;-)
> repository instead which people seems to help updating nowdays when
> doing user ABI changes, and linking from the mount manpage to it?
Do we have man-power to maintain the same thing on two places?
The FS specific options are already documented in the kernel
Documentation/ directory. I have no strong opinion about it, but I
think the best solution is to maintain this docs on one place only.
The place should be in the kernel tree otherwise developers will
ignore the docs... (it's pretty simple to reject kernel patches
without proper Documentation/ update).
What about to keep this kernel docs in a parse-able (ascidoc?) format
and generate the final man pages from this primary source. The final
man pages could be distributed by util-linux-ng or man-pages.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-26 4:15 mount(8) manpage and filesystem-specific options Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20081126041558.GA9251-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-26 10:54 ` Karel Zak [this message]
[not found] ` <20081126105444.GO2961-sHeGUpI7y9L/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-26 20:05 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-11-26 20:46 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20081126200526.GX3186-RIaA196FMs1uuQVovAj/GogTZbYi8/ss@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-26 23:03 ` Karel Zak
2008-11-28 21:03 ` Michael Kerrisk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126105444.GO2961@nb.net.home \
--to=kzak-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=util-linux-ng-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).