linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2]: check for fops->owner in anon_inode_getfd
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:17:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811272017.26719.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811271034210.3147@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>

> > +	if (fops->owner && !try_module_get(fops->owner))
> > +		return -ENOENT;
> > +
> >  	error = get_unused_fd_flags(flags);
> >  	if (error < 0)
> >  		return error;
> 
> What if get_unused_fd_flags() (or the following error-returing ops) fails 
> after a successful try_module_get()?

Right, well spotted. I have added a fixup label.

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

There is an imbalance for anonymous inodes. If the fops->owner field is set,
the module reference count of owner is decreases on release. 
("filp_close" --> "__fput" ---> "fops_put")

On the other hand, anon_inode_getfd does not increase the module reference 
count of owner. This causes two problems:

- if owner is set, the module refcount goes negative
- if owner is not set, the module can be unloaded while code is running 

This patch changes anon_inode_getfd to be symmetric regarding fops->owner 
handling.

I have checked all existing users of anon_inode_getfd. Noone sets fops->owner, 
thats why nobody has seen the module refcount negative.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>


From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

There is an imbalance for anonymous inodes. If the fops->owner field is set,
the module reference count of owner is decreases on release. 
("filp_close" --> "__fput" ---> "fops_put")

On the other hand, anon_inode_getfd does not increase the module reference 
count of owner. This causes two problems:

- if owner is set, the module refcount goes negative
- if owner is not set, the module can be unloaded while code is running 

This patch changes anon_inode_getfd to be symmetric regarding fops->owner 
handling.

I have checked all existing users of anon_inode_getfd. Noone sets fops->owner, 
thats why nobody has seen the module refcount negative.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
 fs/anon_inodes.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: kvm/fs/anon_inodes.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/fs/anon_inodes.c
+++ kvm/fs/anon_inodes.c
@@ -79,9 +79,12 @@ int anon_inode_getfd(const char *name, c
 	if (IS_ERR(anon_inode_inode))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (fops->owner && !try_module_get(fops->owner))
+		return -ENOENT;
+
 	error = get_unused_fd_flags(flags);
 	if (error < 0)
-		return error;
+		goto err_module;
 	fd = error;
 
 	/*
@@ -128,6 +131,8 @@ err_dput:
 	dput(dentry);
 err_put_unused_fd:
 	put_unused_fd(fd);
+err_module:
+	module_put(fops->owner);
 	return error;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(anon_inode_getfd);

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-27 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200811202010.00125.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <49295F6D.8010200@redhat.com>
2008-11-25  8:07   ` [PATCH/RFC 2] kvm: fix module refcount issues with anon_inodegetfd Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-25 13:55     ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-27 14:01       ` [PATCH/Request for review]: check for fops->owner in anon_inode_getfd Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-27 18:49         ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-27 19:17           ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2008-11-27 19:40             ` [PATCH v2]: " Davide Libenzi
2008-12-01  8:57               ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200811272017.26719.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).