From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2]: check for fops->owner in anon_inode_getfd
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:17:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811272017.26719.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0811271034210.3147@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
> > + if (fops->owner && !try_module_get(fops->owner))
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > error = get_unused_fd_flags(flags);
> > if (error < 0)
> > return error;
>
> What if get_unused_fd_flags() (or the following error-returing ops) fails
> after a successful try_module_get()?
Right, well spotted. I have added a fixup label.
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
There is an imbalance for anonymous inodes. If the fops->owner field is set,
the module reference count of owner is decreases on release.
("filp_close" --> "__fput" ---> "fops_put")
On the other hand, anon_inode_getfd does not increase the module reference
count of owner. This causes two problems:
- if owner is set, the module refcount goes negative
- if owner is not set, the module can be unloaded while code is running
This patch changes anon_inode_getfd to be symmetric regarding fops->owner
handling.
I have checked all existing users of anon_inode_getfd. Noone sets fops->owner,
thats why nobody has seen the module refcount negative.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
There is an imbalance for anonymous inodes. If the fops->owner field is set,
the module reference count of owner is decreases on release.
("filp_close" --> "__fput" ---> "fops_put")
On the other hand, anon_inode_getfd does not increase the module reference
count of owner. This causes two problems:
- if owner is set, the module refcount goes negative
- if owner is not set, the module can be unloaded while code is running
This patch changes anon_inode_getfd to be symmetric regarding fops->owner
handling.
I have checked all existing users of anon_inode_getfd. Noone sets fops->owner,
thats why nobody has seen the module refcount negative.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
fs/anon_inodes.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: kvm/fs/anon_inodes.c
===================================================================
--- kvm.orig/fs/anon_inodes.c
+++ kvm/fs/anon_inodes.c
@@ -79,9 +79,12 @@ int anon_inode_getfd(const char *name, c
if (IS_ERR(anon_inode_inode))
return -ENODEV;
+ if (fops->owner && !try_module_get(fops->owner))
+ return -ENOENT;
+
error = get_unused_fd_flags(flags);
if (error < 0)
- return error;
+ goto err_module;
fd = error;
/*
@@ -128,6 +131,8 @@ err_dput:
dput(dentry);
err_put_unused_fd:
put_unused_fd(fd);
+err_module:
+ module_put(fops->owner);
return error;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(anon_inode_getfd);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-27 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200811202010.00125.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <49295F6D.8010200@redhat.com>
2008-11-25 8:07 ` [PATCH/RFC 2] kvm: fix module refcount issues with anon_inodegetfd Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-25 13:55 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-27 14:01 ` [PATCH/Request for review]: check for fops->owner in anon_inode_getfd Christian Borntraeger
2008-11-27 18:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-27 19:17 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2008-11-27 19:40 ` [PATCH v2]: " Davide Libenzi
2008-12-01 8:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811272017.26719.borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).