From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] relatime: Make relatime smarter Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:45:25 +0000 Message-ID: <20081128134525.GB5058@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20081126195457.GA3541@srcf.ucam.org> <20081126195824.GB3541@srcf.ucam.org> <492DD035.5020705@oracle.com> <20081127150126.GA20941@srcf.ucam.org> <20081127150341.GB20941@srcf.ucam.org> <20081127163535.775729bf@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20081127164754.GC22963@srcf.ucam.org> <20081127165929.GA23366@srcf.ucam.org> <20081127191547.7c9cf6d2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20081128111630.GG6138@shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alan Cox , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, val.henson@gmail.com, matthew@wil.cx To: Jamie Lokier Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:48136 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751520AbYK1Npf (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:45:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081128111630.GG6138@shareable.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:16:30AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > + relatime_interval= > > > + [FS] relative atime update frequency, in seconds. > > > + (default: 1 day: 86400 seconds) > > > > What about leap seconds ;) > > More generally - is the relatime_interval in "monotonic" seconds, or > in gettimeofday seconds which are changed by clock updates? If this is actually a problem people in the real world are worried about, I think there's been a fundamental failure in the human race. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org