From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jamie Lokier" <jamie@shareable.org>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@logfs.org>, "Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@wil.cx>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, val.henson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:32:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081129123220.67fd1e6a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081129190245.GA21502@srcf.ucam.org>
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:02:45 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:56:45PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
>
> > I don't see why there is an objection to per-mountpoint.
> > Andrew Morton's syntax: mount /dev/foo /mnt/bar -o relatime=86400
> > looks natural to me.
>
> If somebody feels that this functionality would be useful, they're
> welcome to write it.
If someone writes it, I'll merge it.
> A global default doesn't preclude per-mountpoint
> settings. This patch makes the existing kernel code more useful and so
> is worthwhile on its own, even if it doesn't scratch everyone's itch.
The standard, usual, expected way of modifying a filesystem's behaviour
is via mount options. This is also quite flexible.
Is there some extraordinary reason why the standard interface is not to
be used here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-29 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-26 19:54 [PATCH 1/2] relatime: Make atime updates more useful Matthew Garrett
2008-11-26 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour Matthew Garrett
2008-11-26 21:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-26 22:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-11-27 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] relatime: Make relatime behaviour smarter Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 15:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 15:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-27 16:03 ` Karel Zak
[not found] ` <20081127160353.GQ2961-sHeGUpI7y9L/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-27 17:30 ` Pádraig Brady
[not found] ` <492ED945.5010600-V8g9lnOeT5ydJdNcDFJN0w@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-27 17:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 16:35 ` Alan Cox
2008-11-27 16:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 16:59 ` [PATCH v3] relatime: Make relatime smarter Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-27 17:58 ` [PATCH v4] " Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 22:08 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-11-27 22:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-28 11:13 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-28 13:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-28 11:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-28 13:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-28 13:47 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-12-02 11:10 ` Karel Zak
2008-12-02 16:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-27 19:15 ` [PATCH v3] " Alan Cox
2008-11-28 11:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-28 13:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 17:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] relatime: Allow making relatime the default behaviour Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-29 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-29 13:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-29 13:57 ` Jörn Engel
2008-11-29 18:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2008-11-29 19:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-29 20:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-11-29 20:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-11-29 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-29 21:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 20:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-29 21:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-29 21:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2008-11-27 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] relatime: Make relatime behaviour smarter Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 8:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] relatime: Make atime updates more useful Andrew Morton
2008-12-02 17:19 ` [PATCH] relatime: Let relatime update atime at least once per day Matthew Garrett
2008-12-13 5:26 ` Valerie Aurora Henson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081129123220.67fd1e6a.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=joern@logfs.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=val.henson@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).