From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:24:20 -0500 Message-ID: <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> References: <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218224418.804f10bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Howells , Trond Myklebust , steved@redhat.com, rwheeler@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:50063 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751013AbYLROYl (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:24:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081218224418.804f10bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:44:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Added from today. > > Usual spiel: all patches in that branch must have been > posted to a relevant mailing list > reviewed > unit tested > destined for the next merge window (or the current release) > *before* they are included. I don't think we want fscache for .29 yet. I'd rather let the credential code settle for one release, and have more time for actually reviewing it properly and have it 100% ready for .30.