From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:07:26 -0800 Message-ID: <20081228200726.7b7078b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org> <20081218123601.11810b7f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200812190007.34581.bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm> <20081218152616.a24c013f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081219110539.7e7e230c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bernd Schubert , nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, steved@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081229144533.4a0ab696.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:45:33 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I ask because it > reappeared in linux-next today via the nfs tree (merged into that on Dec > 24 and 25) ... And that of course means that many many 2.6.28 patches which I am maintaining will need significant rework to apply on top of linux-next, and then they won't apply to mainline. Or that linux-next will not apply on top of those patches. Mainly memory management. Please drop the NFS tree until after -rc1. Guys, this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/27/173