From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [1/9] pohmelfs: documentation. Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:23:33 +0300 Message-ID: <20081230212333.GC20238@ioremap.net> References: <1230301130-1325-1-git-send-email-zbe@ioremap.net> <1230301130-1325-2-git-send-email-zbe@ioremap.net> <20081226192219.GB1761@ucw.cz> <20081228134155.GB858@ioremap.net> <4d8e3fd30812281419y4d40a78fha3eb7bc05e55e8ef@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pavel Machek , Evgeniy Polyakov , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pohmelfs@ioremap.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Ciarrocchi Return-path: Received: from genesysrack.ru ([195.178.208.66]:32985 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752491AbYL3VXf (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:23:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4d8e3fd30812281419y4d40a78fha3eb7bc05e55e8ef@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Paolo. On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 11:19:29PM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi (paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com) wrote: > Performance seems to be the most important argument in favour of pohmelfs. > You should probably add more performance data in the cover letter of > the patch serie. All the information are already available but not > easy to be reached. > In short, try to do a better work in "selling" your product :-) I will create easily understandible graphs and put a link to them into the description. Performance is indeed one of the interesting parts among POHMELFS features. -- Evgeniy Polyakov