From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Btrfs for mainline
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:45:33 -0800
Message-ID: <20081231104533.abfb1cf9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <1230722935.4680.5.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1230722935.4680.5.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:28:55 -0500 Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,

Hi!

> I've done some testing against Linus' git tree from last night and the
> current btrfs trees still work well.

what's btrfs?  I think I've heard the name before, but I've never
seen the patches :)